Regulatory Coordinator

Full course · Regulatory Operations Leadership and Career Progression

Process mapping for regulatory operations: documenting how things actually work, not how the SOP says they should — Regulatory Operations Leadership and Career Progression

Process mapping for regulatory operations: documenting how things actually work, not how the SOP says they should

Learn to map regulatory operations workflows as they actually function, surface the gap between SOP and practice, and read a finished map for waste and compliance risk.

22 min

Process mapping for regulatory operations: documenting how things actually work, not how the SOP says they should

Every regulatory operations team has two processes: the one written in the SOP and the one that actually happens on Tuesday morning when the IRB portal is down and a continuing review is due. The first is tidy. The second is what your department actually does. The first is what auditors read. The second is what your coordinators live.

I have spent a great deal of time watching the gap between these two. It is, I have come to believe, the most important real estate in any regulatory operation. It is where unnecessary effort lives. It is where compliance risk lives. It is where every reasonable improvement opportunity you will ever encounter lives. And it is invisible to anyone who reads only the SOP.

In Module 2 you learned that cross-training reveals which processes a team actually depends on. Now we map them. Not the SOP version. The version that exists.

What you will learn3 objectives

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

Apply process mapping techniques (swimlane diagrams, workflow documentation, time-motion tracking) to a regulatory operations workflow, capturing the actual steps, decision points, handoffs, wait times, and workarounds that characterize how the process truly functions
Analyze the difference between a documented SOP and the mapped actual process for a specific regulatory workflow (e.g., continuing review submission), identifying where the process has diverged from the SOP, why the divergence occurred, and whether the divergence represents an improvement, a workaround, or a compliance risk
Evaluate a completed process map to identify the categories of waste and risk that process improvement can address: unnecessary steps, redundant approvals, information bottlenecks, handoff errors, and uncontrolled variability between performers

Progress saves itself — finish reading and this lesson completes

Continue with the Regulatory Coordinator track

Process mapping for regulatory operations: documenting how things actually work, not how the SOP says they should